|
[XSL-LIST Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] RE: This can't be right, XML with no root element: Sax
From: Tony Graham [SMTP:Tony.Graham@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] Sent: Friday, July 27, 2001 12:10 PM To: xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Subject: RE: This can't be right, XML with no root element: Saxon & XT vs. Xalan <snip> Thank you for that detailed answer. Two years working with XML/XSLT and today whole new world is opened up to me. The XML bible makes no reference that I can find to these text declarations. Is it correct then to use this in a text declaration?: <?xml encoding="utf-8"?> On the more general issue, I take it that either Xalan or Cocoon has a bug in this area (a bug I like, but a bug all the same). I'm wondering about Schematrons output. While it may not be incorrect, wouldn't the best thing be to use the text output mode? It is just text afterall. When do you use external parsed entities with plain text? Do all external parsed entities have to have the declaration, so you cannot read in a simple ASCII file, for example? XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|

Cart








