Re: Leading +
On Sat, 9 Jun 2001 12:15:36 +0200 (MET DST), Oliver Becker wrote: >Hi, > >according to the XPath spec, number('+1') should return NaN, shouldn't >it?. But it seems, XT, Saxon, Xalan and OracleXSL don't agree with me. > >Who is right? IMO you are, though I read Mike Kay's paraphrase of the spec rather than the real thing. Saxon 6.2.2 also produces 100 for number('1e2') which is again "wrong", and I would not be surprised (or upset) if the others do too. Regards, Trevor Nash XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!
Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced!
Download The World's Best XML IDE!
Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today!
Subscribe in XML format