Re: XSL Namespaces - confused

> In all examples and recommendations  (well not all, but most of them) 
> they suggest using the http://www.w3.org/1999/XSL/Transform ns, but
> that seems to be a bad idea since it is not supported, are those 
> recomendations all dated,

You have that entirely backwards. http://www.w3.org/1999/XSL/Transform
is the standard XSL language which is supported by all current XSL
systems (Including Microsoft's). http://www.w3.org/TR/WD-xsl is
a completely different incompatible language thatis not supported on any
platform other than Microsoft (and even there only for compatibility
with version 2 of their parser)

>  or is there any good reason for using that 
> instead of http://www.w3.org/TR/WD-xsl ?
> 
Yes. 

David



_____________________________________________________________________
This message has been checked for all known viruses by Star Internet delivered
through the MessageLabs Virus Control Centre. For further information visit
http://www.star.net.uk/stats.asp

 XSL-List info and archive:  http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list