Re: XSL Namespaces - confused
> In all examples and recommendations (well not all, but most of them) > they suggest using the http://www.w3.org/1999/XSL/Transform ns, but > that seems to be a bad idea since it is not supported, are those > recomendations all dated, You have that entirely backwards. http://www.w3.org/1999/XSL/Transform is the standard XSL language which is supported by all current XSL systems (Including Microsoft's). http://www.w3.org/TR/WD-xsl is a completely different incompatible language thatis not supported on any platform other than Microsoft (and even there only for compatibility with version 2 of their parser) > or is there any good reason for using that > instead of http://www.w3.org/TR/WD-xsl ? > Yes. David _____________________________________________________________________ This message has been checked for all known viruses by Star Internet delivered through the MessageLabs Virus Control Centre. For further information visit http://www.star.net.uk/stats.asp XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!
Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced!
Download The World's Best XML IDE!
Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today!
Subscribe in XML format