Subject: Re: ANNOUNCE: Petition to withdraw xsl:script from XSLT 1.1
From: Uche Ogbuji <uche.ogbuji@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 01 Mar 2001 10:18:04 -0700
|
> Hi Guys,
>
> I just wondered if you could expand on:
>
> > 5. Easy distribution of extension functions, a reason commonly cited
> > for embedded scripting, can be addressed separately and does not
> > necessarily have to be solved with the script metaphor, convenient
> > as it may be.
>
> How would you like to see the easy distribution of extension functions
> being addressed?
One possible approach is that RDDL could be a pretty useful hub for extension
function definitions and even implementation download. Ignoring the security
issues, it could be structured no unlike browser plug-ins.
I think this was Clark's idea originally.
--
Uche Ogbuji Principal Consultant
uche.ogbuji@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx +1 303 583 9900 x 101
Fourthought, Inc. http://Fourthought.com
4735 East Walnut St, Ste. C, Boulder, CO 80301-2537, USA
Software-engineering, knowledge-management, XML, CORBA, Linux, Python
XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
| Current Thread |
Uche Ogbuji - Fri, 2 Mar 2001 00:39:11 -0500 (EST) <=
Eric van der Vlist - Thu, 1 Mar 2001 05:51:12 -0500 (EST)
- Evan Lenz - Thu, 1 Mar 2001 13:14:51 -0500 (EST)
|
|