Subject: Re: RDDL as a delivery vehicle for XSLT extensions?
From: David Carlisle <davidc@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 5 Mar 2001 10:35:01 GMT
|
> Not quite so fast.
>
> 1) Now you need to now syncronize all of the
> prefixes across your organizaiton.
No. As in other uses (like extension-element-prefixes) the prefix
is just a local pointer to the URI. Prefixed son't have to match with
the prefixes actually used on function calls.
> 2) You are still limited to implementations in the
> languages referenced in this imported style-sheet
> since there are no other resolution mechanisms.
>
No. If a processor finds an extension function in some namespace it can
do whatever it wants to find a definition for that function. If
xsl:script doesn't supply one (or even if it does) it may use some other
mechanism.
David
_____________________________________________________________________
This message has been checked for all known viruses by Star Internet delivered
through the MessageLabs Virus Control Centre. For further information visit
http://www.star.net.uk/stats.asp
XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
| Current Thread |
- Re: Coordination of script in XHTML, SVG, and XSLT 1.1 (aka RDDLas a delivery vehicle...), (continued)
- Curt Arnold - Sun, 4 Mar 2001 02:32:40 -0500 (EST)
- Elliotte Rusty Harold - Sun, 4 Mar 2001 08:22:11 -0500 (EST)
- David Carlisle - Mon, 5 Mar 2001 05:38:00 -0500 (EST) <=
- Alexey Gokhberg - Fri, 2 Mar 2001 12:05:40 -0500 (EST)
- Clark C. Evans - Fri, 2 Mar 2001 17:56:59 -0500 (EST)
- Steve Muench - Fri, 2 Mar 2001 19:05:35 -0500 (EST)
- Clark C. Evans - Fri, 2 Mar 2001 19:37:28 -0500 (EST)
|
|