> Wouldn't it be nice to have more "shouting" with such results in the
> future? :o)) 

yes, I do rather wish xsl had followed dsssl and mandated tail recursion 
elimination in implementations.

It isn't always trivial to write things in tail recursive form, but at
least in a language that specifies tail recursion is implemented as
iteration, you know it is a worthwhile effort, but in XSL you just
have to hope.

David
 

_____________________________________________________________________
This message has been checked for all known viruses by Star Internet delivered
through the MessageLabs Virus Control Centre. For further information visit
http://www.star.net.uk/stats.asp

 XSL-List info and archive:  http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list