Subject: XSLFO or XSL-FO (was Re: Is XSLT the right name?)
From: Wendell Piez <wapiez@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 20 Mar 2001 12:21:52 +0000
|
XSLFO vs. XSL-FO --
Is there any guidance from the WG or any other "authority" on this?
Cheers,
Wendell
At 11:21 AM 3/20/01, Tony wrote:
Neither XSL-FO nor XSLFO are used in the XSL CR. "xsl-fo" appears
only as the first five characters of "xsl-following", "xsl-footnote",
and "xsl-footnote-separator". XSLFO doesn't appear at all.
"XSL-FO" (and any variation on it that you've seen) is merely a term
that has come into common use but that has no standing in the XSL CR.
>From the point of view of the XSL CR, the formatting process is not a
separable portion of XSL, so the CR never uses the term.
Regards,
Tony Graham
======================================================================
Wendell Piez mailto:wapiez@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Mulberry Technologies, Inc. http://www.mulberrytech.com
17 West Jefferson Street Direct Phone: 301/315-9635
Suite 207 Phone: 301/315-9631
Rockville, MD 20850 Fax: 301/315-8285
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Mulberry Technologies: A Consultancy Specializing in SGML and XML
======================================================================
XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
|
Cart
