RE: Re: [ANNOUNCE] XSLT-process 1.2 available

Michael Kay writes:
 > > If the XSLT writes to standard output, yes. but if I use eg the Saxon
 > > extension to create a new file, I expect that to be created
 > > in the same directory as the input.
 > 
 > Saxon's <xsl:document> doesn't yet fully conform to the XSLT 1.1 draft: the
 > filename is interpreted relative to the current directory rather than the
 > base URI. This is a documented restriction.

I don't use xsl:document (I reverted back to 6.0.2 and saxon:output),
because I cannot see any way to write a stylesheet using it that any
other processor today will accept. Is there a way?

so my problem will go away with final xsl:document, I gather. thats good.

Sebastian


 XSL-List info and archive:  http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list