RE: XSLT 1.1 comments

Play the video

Subject: RE: XSLT 1.1 comments
From: "Michael Kay" <mhkay@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 11 Feb 2001 15:20:01 -0000

> introducing the need for language bindings only reduces general
> interoperability while giving a small boost to
> interoperability between small axes of implementations.
>
I don't understand. How can defining a Java language binding which
implementors are at liberty to implement or not, reduce interoperability
when compared with allowing each implementor to invent a different Java
language binding, which is the current situation at XSLT 1.0?

Mike Kay


 XSL-List info and archive:  http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list

Current Thread

Re: XSLT 1.1 comments, (continued)
- Daniel Veillard - Sun, 11 Feb 2001 04:22:00 -0500 (EST)
  - Francis Norton - Sun, 11 Feb 2001 14:25:23 -0500 (EST)
    - Uche Ogbuji - Mon, 12 Feb 2001 19:29:04 -0500 (EST)
    - Steve Muench - Mon, 12 Feb 2001 19:57:44 -0500 (EST)
- Michael Kay - Sun, 11 Feb 2001 10:18:06 -0500 (EST) <=
  - Alexey Gokhberg - Mon, 12 Feb 2001 05:01:05 -0500 (EST)
    - Steve Muench - Mon, 12 Feb 2001 12:31:13 -0500 (EST)
    - Alexey Gokhberg - Mon, 12 Feb 2001 16:52:13 -0500 (EST)
    - Steve Muench - Mon, 12 Feb 2001 17:31:24 -0500 (EST)

<- Previous	Index	Next ->
Re: XSLT 1.1 comments, Steve Muench	Thread	Re: XSLT 1.1 comments, Alexey Gokhberg
Re: XSLT 1.1 comments, Daniel Veillard	Date	choose - when problem, Jo Kong HO
	Month

PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!

Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced!

Download The World's Best XML IDE!

Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today!

Subscribe in XML format

RSS 2.0
Atom 0.3

XML Editor - Download a 15 Day Free Trial Now >

See What's New in Stylus Studio >

Buy Stylus Studio - XML Editor - Now >