Re: RE: syntax sugar for call-template

Play the video

Subject: Re: RE: syntax sugar for call-template
From: Francis Norton <francis@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 16 Feb 2001 13:13:11 +0000

David Carlisle wrote:
> 
<snip good explanation>
> 
> There is no way for a named template to emulate copy-of which is one
> reeasons why viewing XSLT functions as syntaxtic sugar for named
> templates may not be quite the right thing and you need something like
> saxon:return.
> 
Thank you - I *was* being lazy!

Francis.

 XSL-List info and archive:  http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list

Current Thread

Re: RE: syntax sugar for call-template, (continued)

<- Previous	Index	Next ->
Re: RE: syntax sugar for call, David Carlisle	Thread	Re: RE: syntax sugar for call, Jeni Tennison
Re: xsl:include still a probl, David Carlisle	Date	Re: RE: syntax sugar for call, Jeni Tennison
	Month

PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!

Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced!

Download The World's Best XML IDE!

Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today!

Subscribe in XML format

RSS 2.0
Atom 0.3

XML Editor - Download a 15 Day Free Trial Now >

See What's New in Stylus Studio >

Buy Stylus Studio - XML Editor - Now >