Re: RE: syntax sugar for call-template
David Carlisle wrote: > <snip good explanation> > > There is no way for a named template to emulate copy-of which is one > reeasons why viewing XSLT functions as syntaxtic sugar for named > templates may not be quite the right thing and you need something like > saxon:return. > Thank you - I *was* being lazy! Francis. XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!
Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced!
Download The World's Best XML IDE!
Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today!
Subscribe in XML format