Re: [exsl] Draft 0.1 - call for comments

Excellent work!
 To be honest being a bit overloaded lately I have not followed closely
the exsl thread but seeing the draft I have realized:

!I do want something like this! :))


 

Jeni Tennison wrote:
> 
> Hi,
> 
> I've put together a draft document that summarises our recent
> discussions on user-defined extension functions written in XSLT at:
> 
>   http://www.jenitennison.com/xslt/exsl.html
> 
> Comments on it should be sent here, to XSL-List with [exsl] at the
> start of the subject line.
> 
> The main part of the document specifies the extension elements and
> functions (viz exsl:function, exsl:return and exsl:node-set()) that
> we've been talking about. Several outstanding issues are highlighted,
> but comments on other areas are welcome. It would be particularly
> helpful to hear from implementers.
> 
> Appendix B gives loads of use cases of functions that could be
> implemented under this scheme, many of them borrowed from Saxon, which
> demonstrate the strengths (and weaknesses) of the scheme described in
> the document. If you have more use cases, then please let us know
> about them and, preferably, their solution.
> 
> I'm not sure how long would be an adequate review period - one week?
> two? longer? Maybe it's best to wait and see how much discussion there
> is.
> 
> Cheers,
> 
> Jeni
> ---
> Jeni Tennison
> http://www.jenitennison.com/
> 
>  XSL-List info and archive:  http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list

-- 
******************************************
<firstName> Miloslav </firstName>    
<surname>   Nic      </surname>     

<mail>    nicmila@xxxxxxxxx    </mail>   
<support> http://www.zvon.org  </support>
<zvonMailingList> 
    http://www.zvon.org/index.php?nav_id=4 
</zvonMailingList>

 XSL-List info and archive:  http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list