Re: XSLT 1.1 comments (portability)

David Carlisle  wrote:

> which relates to a question I was going to ask about what do people mean
> by a portable stylesheet.
>
> One that doesn't use features of XSLT declared to be system independent
>
> or
>
> One that works uniformly on the XSL engines you have available.

Following C terminology, I usually use "portable" to mean the second
and "strictly conforming" to mean the first.


--Joe English

  jenglish@xxxxxxxxxxxxx

 XSL-List info and archive:  http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list