[XSL-LIST Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Re: RE: syntax sugar for call-template

Subject: Re: RE: syntax sugar for call-template
From: Dimitre Novatchev <dnovatchev@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 15 Feb 2001 23:49:28 -0800 (PST)
studio xf london
> > >  In the past I've considered doing this in Saxon. But I'm undecided whether
> > >  the attribute value should be an AVT (therefore always yielding a string) or
> > >  an XPath expression (in which case any value can be passed, but strings need
> > >  to be written in double-nested quotes, e.g. arg="'London'"). Any views?
> > >  
> > 
> > Obviously, only the latter will make it possible to substitute any 
> > xsl:call-template with xf:func.
> 
> As pointed out by Steve Muench, the attribute version will 
> not be able to pass result fragments.  However, a slightly
> modified version using "elements" will do the trick...
> 
>   <xf:func one="xpath" />           <xsl:call-template name="func">
>                           becomes     <xsl:with-param name="one" 
>                                                       select="xpath" />
>                                     </xsl:call-template> 
> 
> 
>   <xf:func one="xpath" >            <xsl:call-template name="func">
>     <two>                             <xsl:with-param name="one"
>       <res>frag</res>     becomes                     select="xpath" />
>     </two>                            <xsl:with-param name="two">
>   </xf:func>                             <res>frag</res>
>                                       </xsl:with-param>
>                                     </xsl:call-template>
> 
> Clearly, the attribute-only version is much cleaner.  However,
> the element syntax below could be used for those times when a 
> result fragment must be passed... I'm not sure I like it though.


In case an RTF must be passed as parameter, why should it be literally included?

Having it into a variable and using:
       <xf:func one="xpath" two="$varRTF"/>      

is the elegant way of doing this.

Also, isn't it true that there would not be any RTF data type in XSLT 1.1?

Dimitre Novatchev.

     


__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Get personalized email addresses from Yahoo! Mail - only $35 
a year!  http://personal.mail.yahoo.com/

 XSL-List info and archive:  http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list


Current Thread

PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!

Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced!

Buy Stylus Studio Now

Download The World's Best XML IDE!

Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today!

Don't miss another message! Subscribe to this list today.
Email
First Name
Last Name
Company
Subscribe in XML format
RSS 2.0
Atom 0.3
Site Map | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Trademarks
Free Stylus Studio XML Training:
W3C Member
Stylus Studio® and DataDirect XQuery ™are products from DataDirect Technologies, is a registered trademark of Progress Software Corporation, in the U.S. and other countries. © 2004-2013 All Rights Reserved.