RE: XSLT 1.1 comments

Scott_Boag
> Also, I believe the XSL WG would be very happy to put together some
> conference calls among XSLT implementors to sort out concerns about
> language independence in 1.1.

I'd give a +1 to addressing extension requests to implementors on that con
call.
I think most would agree on a small list, some of which are ready in 1.1
Which of the xxx:functions were strongly requested of the implementors then?
I'm sure Mike Kay hasn't implemented his set of extension functions just
for the fun of it! 

How about W3C picking up on those as a subset of 'everything'?

Regards DaveP

 

 XSL-List info and archive:  http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list