[XSL-LIST Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Re: Performance -- Re: RE:"*NEVER* use for-each"

Subject: Re: Performance -- Re: RE:"*NEVER* use for-each"
From: "Anjul Srivastava" <anjul@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 27 Feb 2001 15:56:25 -0800
Re: Performance -- Re:  RE:"*NEVER* use for-each"
> converting them to MBNA core system, BRILLIANT!), reusable (always good),
> reuse (oops, repeated yourself), etc.  Good job.

reusable = write modules that can be reused
reuse = try not to write modules -- try to find modules that others have
written and reuse them
I did mean them as separate characteristics of a good design and wasn't
repeating myself.

Thanks for your comments. About the "for-each", well, where does design end
and implementation begin? I try to "design" the code for the small functions
of the most derived classes that I write! But anyway, that would push me
over the off-topic line if I am not already.



 XSL-List info and archive:  http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list


Current Thread

PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!

Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced!

Buy Stylus Studio Now

Download The World's Best XML IDE!

Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today!

Don't miss another message! Subscribe to this list today.
Email
First Name
Last Name
Company
Subscribe in XML format
RSS 2.0
Atom 0.3
Site Map | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Trademarks
Free Stylus Studio XML Training:
W3C Member
Stylus Studio® and DataDirect XQuery ™are products from DataDirect Technologies, is a registered trademark of Progress Software Corporation, in the U.S. and other countries. © 2004-2013 All Rights Reserved.