Re: Designs for XSLT functions (Was: Re: RE: syntax su
On Thu, 22 Feb 2001, David Carlisle wrote: > J> as a non-recursive and fairly hacky solution. > Hey I was going to post that:-) > One man's (or woman's) "fairly hacky" is another's "more in > the XSLT style" Jeni's approach was very clever. > Personally an xsl:append looks deeply suspect to me, if it's required > for functions why isn't it required for the almost identical situation > of binding node sets to variables? If it is also required for that > is "append" the right concept for a declarative language, or should it > be more like > <xsl:variable select="foo[postion('some named construct corresponding > to an xsl:sort setup') < 5]"/> This seems like a 'XPath' style solution, not really a XSLT style solution. *smirk* Thank you both! Clark XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!
Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced!
Download The World's Best XML IDE!
Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today!
Subscribe in XML format