Re: CDATA back to its original shape
> so if you want to output it unescaped you can (and this may be wrong > from the point of view of xsl gurus) > <xsl:text disable-output-encoding="yes"><cdata ...></xsl:text> You meant <!<[CDATA not <cdata there I think, but beware XSL engines are _not_ obliged to support disable-output-encoding, it is only a hint that you might like it output that way. But why would anyone want to write <xsl:text disable-output-encoding="yes"><![CDATA[ <foo> </foo>]]></xsl:text> which is a horrible kludge even when it works, when you can far more simply write <foo> </foo> and just output the foo node as a literal result element? David _____________________________________________________________________ This message has been checked for all known viruses by Star Internet delivered through the MessageLabs Virus Control Centre. For further information visit http://www.star.net.uk/stats.asp XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!
Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced!
Download The World's Best XML IDE!
Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today!
Subscribe in XML format