namespace for xxx:script (was: XSLT 1.1 comments)
I said > If instead it was a top level element in the XSl namespace that was > allowed to be ignored, I don't see how you would be worse off, If there were a standardised namespace for extension elements and functions, an alternative would be to put xxx:script into that. <xslx:script xmlns:xslx="...">... whatever That would mean that it would automatically be ignored by default according to XSLT 1.0 rules, and would be a stronger indication to implementors that they needn't support this, in particular they could still claim "full conformance" to XSLT without doing anything with this element at all. David _____________________________________________________________________ This message has been checked for all known viruses by Star Internet delivered through the MessageLabs Virus Control Centre. For further information visit http://www.star.net.uk/stats.asp XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!
Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced!
Download The World's Best XML IDE!
Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today!
Subscribe in XML format