Fwd: [Schematron-love-in] Screamatron Torture Test

>Rick Jelliffe wrote:




>I've put a page detailing the results of attempting to port
>conformance1-5.xsl
>(i.e. the new skeleton with the conformance language output) to about 10
>different
>Wintel C and Java off-the-shelf XSLT processors.
>http://www.ascc.net/xml/schematron/1.5/conrep.html
>
>Executive Summary: we don't have a chance of getting anywhere until
>the XSLT implementations are better.  I pity the innocent programmer who
>reads about Schematron and downloads it and tries to make it work.
>
>Recommended processors: SAXON first, with XT and Xalan4C also acceptable.
>
>I don't join in the XSLT maillists, but if anyone here does, perhaps you
>could forward this to that group with the suggestion that
>conformance1-5.xsl + skeleton1-5.xsl + schematron1-5.xml  seem to make an
>excellent torture test.
>
>Cheers
>Rick Jelliffe


 XSL-List info and archive:  http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list