Subject: RE: Designs for XSLT functions
From: "Michael Kay" <mhkay@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 19 Feb 2001 22:08:24 -0000
|
> > > I think clearly separating the specification of the abilities:
> > >
> > > -> to statically define and statically
> > > invoke functions in XSLT, and
> > >
> > > -> to dynamically invoke functions
I don't see any need for special syntax to invoke functions whose name is
decided at run-time. That can easily be done using a general-purpose
evaluate() extension that constructs XPath expressions from strings.
Mike Kay
XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
| Current Thread |
- Common Extension Process (was: Re: Designs for XSLT functions), (continued)
- Uche Ogbuji - Tue, 20 Feb 2001 09:48:54 -0500 (EST)
- Steve Muench - Mon, 19 Feb 2001 02:08:13 -0500 (EST)
- Jeni Tennison - Mon, 19 Feb 2001 04:17:38 -0500 (EST)
- Uche Ogbuji - Mon, 19 Feb 2001 11:33:16 -0500 (EST)
- Michael Kay - Mon, 19 Feb 2001 17:39:23 -0500 (EST) <=
- Uche Ogbuji - Tue, 20 Feb 2001 09:42:54 -0500 (EST)
- Steve Muench - Mon, 19 Feb 2001 23:27:35 -0500 (EST)
- Uche Ogbuji - Tue, 20 Feb 2001 09:39:43 -0500 (EST)
- Francis Norton - Mon, 19 Feb 2001 13:55:54 -0500 (EST)
|
|