Re: XSLT 1.1 comments
On Thu, 15 Feb 2001, Uche Ogbuji wrote: > > I think it would be very nice if someone set up a namespace for experimental > > extension elements and functions with some simple rules: > > > > * Anyone can define a function and register it in this namespace provided > > that > > - the name is not already registered > > - they provide a clear specification of what the function does > > - the function is intrinsically portable (i.e. it is theoretically capable > > of being > > implemented on any processor or any platform) > > - the function is free of side-effects > > - there is a four-week period for comments and discussion before the spec > > is frozen > > - the person registering the function provides open source > > implementation(s) that work with at least one processor > > - there is an opportunity for other people to provide implementation(s) > > for other processors. > > Now you're talking. > > Is it not worth trying out this approach for a while before > diving in with the XSLT 1.1 stuff? Nice. Very Nice. ;) Clark XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!
Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced!
Download The World's Best XML IDE!
Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today!
Subscribe in XML format