RE: Re: FXPath - A comment on EXSL
> From: David Rosenborg [mailto:david.rosenborg@xxxxxxxxxx] > Sent: 28 February 2001 14:45 > Yes, and I think user defined extension functions sits almost > right in the middle of > the two. I think that's why we can find sensible arguments > for choosing > either syntax for this purpose. However, as you know, I think most > of the extension functions will deal with XPath types and should > therefore be implemented in an XPath fashion. Simple question just on this one. Would a resultant stylesheet using this form still be a valid XML document, as per today? Regards DaveP XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!
Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced!
Download The World's Best XML IDE!
Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today!
Subscribe in XML format