Re: Fallback from document() error

I would gladly accept any form of exception handling.

I have proposed xsl:fallback as it is already a part of XSLT spec
so the only syntactic change is an increase in the number of elements
xsl:fallback can be used in and I do not consider reasonable to have 2
different exception mechanisms in one language.

Are there any plans from XSLT working group?

Kay Michael wrote:
> 
> There is certainly a need for some kind of exception handling mechanism
> here, though I'm not sure xsl:fallback is the right answer.
> 
> Mike Kay
> 
> > Being quite often plagued by problems with
> > document('foo.xml') function when foo() does not exist
> > I was wandering about means how to solve it.
> >
> 
>  XSL-List info and archive:  http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list

-- 
******************************************
<firstName> Miloslav </firstName>    
<surname>   Nic      </surname>     

<mail>    nicmila@xxxxxxxxx    </mail>   
<support> http://www.zvon.org  </support>
<zvonMailingList> 
    http://www.zvon.org/index.php?nav_id=4 
</zvonMailingList>

 XSL-List info and archive:  http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list