RE: switching from xalan (J) to saxon
> I was running both from a java application, and found Saxon to be much > faster. I am transforming xml pages that are at times 5 mb. > > Now, I don't know why the transform performance was so much > different. With a 5Mb source file, chances are the difference is caused by memory usage. I've worked quite hard in Saxon to minimize the memory used by the tree. With any processor, once the tree size exceeds real memory available, performance drops dramatically. Mike Kay > XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!
Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced!
Download The World's Best XML IDE!
Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today!
Subscribe in XML format