RE: switching from xalan (J) to saxon
We have been evaluating both Saxon and Xalan, and have not seen much of a performance difference. We are currently planning on using xalan. Did you see a large performance difference between the two? Were you using this at run time of from the command line? Any input would be greatly appreciated! -Dan -----Original Message----- From: Messineo, Chris [mailto:CMessineo@xxxxxxxxx] Sent: Thursday, November 30, 2000 10:22 AM To: 'xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx' Subject: RE: switching from xalan (J) to saxon I made the change from Xalan to Saxon, and did not have to change any of my xslt pages. -----Original Message----- From: Robert Herschke [mailto:robert@xxxxxxxxxxx] Sent: Saturday, December 30, 2000 2:21 AM To: xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Subject: switching from xalan (J) to saxon Hello everybody, For performance reasons we will switch our renderer from xalan to saxon soon. Perhaps somebody has done this too. My questions: - are there some tables or lists of xsl-constructs that doesn't match in this two processors ? - are there known issues, like "Do not use this in saxon, as you do it in xalan"? - does anybody know something about conversions between XSL-files written for Xalan to XSL-Files converted for Saxon? --- or are there 100% compatibility between the constructs in XSL-files? Thanks for your help in advance! Robert XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!
Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced!
Download The World's Best XML IDE!
Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today!
Subscribe in XML format