Subject: RE: Which engine? (RE: JavaScript and XSL)
From: DPawson@xxxxxxxxxxx
Date: Mon, 23 Oct 2000 09:00:45 +0100
|
Mike Brown
> SAXON only started doing this with version 5.5, which is only
> a few weeks
> old. If you read the release notes you would see the
> reasoning behind it.
> It is 'anticipatory conformance' (anticipating XSLT 1.1) whereas when
> MSXML did it, it was 'irresponsible disregard for the recommended
> extension function interfaces' because at that time there was
> no hint that
> it would ever be accepted practice.
I'm beginning to feel sympathy with MS on this one.
My guess, Mike Kay looks ahead to 1.1, whereas MS, trying to be
fully conformant, say no, having been beaten about the head for
non-conformance for months.
I'd guess time will smooth this one out.
DaveP
XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
| Current Thread |
|---|
- RE: Which engine? (RE: JavaScript and XSL), (continued)
- Pollington, Lee (ELSLON) - Tue, 17 Oct 2000 12:48:33 +0100
- Kaganovich, Yevgeniy (Eugene) - Tue, 17 Oct 2000 14:32:43 -0700
- Paul Tchistopolskii - Tue, 17 Oct 2000 20:30:18 -0700
- DPawson - Mon, 23 Oct 2000 09:00:45 +0100 <=
- Mike Brown - Mon, 23 Oct 2000 03:13:03 -0600 (MDT)
- Kay Michael - Mon, 23 Oct 2000 09:43:44 +0100
- Andrew Kimball - Tue, 24 Oct 2000 12:53:11 -0400 (EST)
- Don Bruey - Tue, 24 Oct 2000 16:03:53 -0400 (EST)
|
|
Cart
