RE: Formatting elements

i'm kind of new to this, are you two saying add xml tags for the purpose of
giving xslt processors a place to grab hold?

if so, how do you choose where to put these?

-a

> -----Original Message-----
> From: sara.mitchell@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:sara.mitchell@xxxxxxxxx]
> Sent: Tuesday, October 10, 2000 9:28 AM
> To: xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: RE: Formatting elements
> 
> 
> I agree, this is something that 'ought' to appear as a 
> design pattern -- perhaps with some demonstrations to 
> back it up. I've talked DTD design principles with 
> several programmers who come from a data-background or 
> are familiar with HTML (which does very little of this)
> and they are very suspicious (or incredulous) of the
> idea of adding wrapper elements. (In some cases, I 
> literally think they didn't respond because their
> initial reaction seemed impolite!)
> 
> It goes against the grain of their experience, but it 
> can literally be a huge improvement both in simplifying 
> the stylesheet and sometimes in improving response time 
> (this one is _really_ counter-intuitive). 
> 
> Sara
> 
> >DaveP wrote: (snipped)
> > 
> > Often one additional wrapper in the source XML makes all the 
> > difference in the world to the ease of processing via XSLT.
> >  To be able to sit (sorry, template match) on the wrapper, and play
> > with the children (??) of that wrapper is a piece of cake compared
> > to matching on one of many, and chasing along the axis to do 
> > something.
> > 
> > There's a design pattern here... somewhere.
> > 
> > DaveP
> >  
> > 
> > 
> >  XSL-List info and archive:  
> http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
> > 
> 
> 
>  XSL-List info and archive:  http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
> 


 XSL-List info and archive:  http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list