And the current version (v5) will still include SGML and DTD support for
free, and most of the benefits of the new v6 are supposedly related to
well-formed XML.

Now my question is, when they made the announcement, why couldn't Omnimark
have phrased it as clearly as Rick just did?  I think it would have caused a
lot less grief, headaches, and flinging of profanities if they had done so.

[hope I don't get this list shut down by criticizing Omnimark's customer
relations strategy! ;)]

-- 
Andrew Webber
HoC PRISM project
WebbeA@xxxxxxxxxx
613-943-7887
cell:  613-797-8123


> -----Original Message-----
> From: Rick Geimer [mailto:Rick.Geimer@xxxxxxx]
> Sent: Thursday, September 07, 2000 12:39 PM
> To: xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: Re: XSLT and Text Processing Languages
> 
> 
> 
> "Pawson, David" wrote:
> > [OmniMark] will no longer be free (for whatever use they 
> > describe it as now)?
> > Is that right Rick?
> 
> Actually, the plan so far, from what I understand, is 
> that they will charge for SGML support and DTD 
> processing in the future, but the new well-formed 
> XML version will be free.
> 
> Rick Geimer
> National Semiconductor
> rick.geimer@xxxxxxx
> 
> 
>  XSL-List info and archive:  http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list


 XSL-List info and archive:  http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list