[XSL-LIST Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

RE: XSLT and Text Processing Languages

Subject: RE: XSLT and Text Processing Languages
From: Thorbjørn Ravn Andersen <TRA@xxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 7 Sep 2000 15:03:33 +0200
microsoft.xmldom memory usage
> OmniMark advantages :
> - Less resource hogging

I beg to differ.  Given an 150 Mb XML input file, my memory usage with Omnimark 5.1 grew to 400 Mb, and I was working with a strictly local program.

Additionally Omnimark has serious trouble with underscores in element-names.  Apparenly XML-input data has to conform to a DTD, which does not always apply for our data.

> - For any other format -> XML, Omnimark is mandatory

Not entirely so.  XML is very easy to generate with Perl, and it is equally easy to parse a lot of non-complex text formats in Perl (if you can put it in a regular expression).  Parsing XML with Perl is rather slow, though.

-- 
  Thorbjørn Ravn Andersen             "...and...Tubular Bells!"
  http://bigfoot.com/~thunderbear


 XSL-List info and archive:  http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list


Current Thread

PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!

Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced!

Buy Stylus Studio Now

Download The World's Best XML IDE!

Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today!

Don't miss another message! Subscribe to this list today.
Email
First Name
Last Name
Company
Subscribe in XML format
RSS 2.0
Atom 0.3
Site Map | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Trademarks
Free Stylus Studio XML Training:
W3C Member
Stylus Studio® and DataDirect XQuery ™are products from DataDirect Technologies, is a registered trademark of Progress Software Corporation, in the U.S. and other countries. © 2004-2013 All Rights Reserved.