|
[XSL-LIST Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] RE: XSLT and Text Processing Languages
> OmniMark advantages : > - Less resource hogging I beg to differ. Given an 150 Mb XML input file, my memory usage with Omnimark 5.1 grew to 400 Mb, and I was working with a strictly local program. Additionally Omnimark has serious trouble with underscores in element-names. Apparenly XML-input data has to conform to a DTD, which does not always apply for our data. > - For any other format -> XML, Omnimark is mandatory Not entirely so. XML is very easy to generate with Perl, and it is equally easy to parse a lot of non-complex text formats in Perl (if you can put it in a regular expression). Parsing XML with Perl is rather slow, though. -- Thorbjørn Ravn Andersen "...and...Tubular Bells!" http://bigfoot.com/~thunderbear XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|

Cart








