Cart
|
[XSL-LIST Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] Re: XSLT and Text Processing Languages
 OmniMark advantages : - Much faster - Can be linked to SureSpeed, the application server manager for OmniMark, that handle the load for App Server in a very neat way - Less resource hogging - Allow everything that would need an external language in XSL-T, including server querying - Can do much more than translation XSL-T advantages : - Much more powerful for tree querying (DOM oriented): you cannot ask for a node that is not in your ancestors with OmniMark, you cannot parse twice the same node... Just tocs are way simpler with XSL-T - Very natural way of outputing XML and HTML (in OmniMark, you output the string of the tag, where in XSLT, you are sure the XML you output is well-formed) - XML-native : the DTD you are using with OmniMark can be SGML-tainted, there would be no reaction at all, whereas XSL-T is very strict with that Conclusion : - For XML->XML or XML->HTML conversion, which is more tree transformation, prefer XSLT - For any other format -> XML, Omnimark is mandatory - For XML -> any other format, Omnimark is probably better - For XML interpretation to trigger programs, OmniMark is clearly the best -- Paul Terray - terray@xxxxxxxxxxxx tel : 01 34 58 70 76 XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list 
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! 
Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|
