[XSL-LIST Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

RE: testing node type

Subject: RE: testing node type
From: Kay Michael <Michael.Kay@xxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 25 Sep 2000 13:06:49 +0100
RE: testing node type
> > > >   <xsl:if test="following-sibling::node()[1][self::comment()]">
> > I think following-sibling::node()[1]/self::comment() should work as
> So, implementor out there,
> can you tell me which is _theoretically_ faster?

In Saxon they do follow different paths in the code, but the access path is
the same in both cases, so I can't think of any reason why one should
perform better than the other.

Mike Kay

 XSL-List info and archive:  http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list

Current Thread


Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced!

Buy Stylus Studio Now

Download The World's Best XML IDE!

Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today!

Don't miss another message! Subscribe to this list today.
First Name
Last Name
Subscribe in XML format
RSS 2.0
Atom 0.3
Site Map | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Trademarks
Free Stylus Studio XML Training:
W3C Member
Stylus Studio® and DataDirect XQuery ™are products from DataDirect Technologies, is a registered trademark of Progress Software Corporation, in the U.S. and other countries. © 2004-2013 All Rights Reserved.