RE: testing node type
> > > > <xsl:if test="following-sibling::node()[self::comment()]"> > > I think following-sibling::node()/self::comment() should work as well. > > So, implementor out there, > can you tell me which is _theoretically_ faster? In Saxon they do follow different paths in the code, but the access path is the same in both cases, so I can't think of any reason why one should perform better than the other. Mike Kay XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!
Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced!
Download The World's Best XML IDE!
Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today!
Subscribe in XML format