RE: Saxon VS XT

I'd argue for Saxon too. It still looks as though XT is faster, according to
recent performance tests published on this list, but Saxon now performs well
too, and on top of that it's much more conformant than XT, and offers more
extensions if you would want to use those. Also, Saxon is still being
developed, while James Clark has announced that he doesn't expect to further
develop XT (although other people might, see http://www.4xt.org). 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jobin, Eric [mailto:EJobin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]
> Sent: Tuesday, August 01, 2000 1:44 PM
> To: xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: Saxon VS XT
> 
> 
> I've been having an arguments with a co-workers about Saxon 
> versus XT.   He
> believes that XT should be "THE" tool while I argue that 
> Saxon has all the
> power and flexibility.  What do you think?
> 
> 
> Thanks!
> 
> 
>  XSL-List info and archive:  http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
> 


 XSL-List info and archive:  http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list