Re: Immediacy of preceding-siblings

Matthew Bentley wrote:
> 
> Does "preceding-sibling::*[1]" select the immediately preceding sibling, or
> would that be "preceding-sibling::*[last()]" ?

An addendum to the previous post. I just did a quick test and got reasonably
confused because of the following expression:

<xsl:for-each select="preceding-sibling::*"> ...

It should be noted that <xsl:for-each> always iterates through nodes in document
order regardless of the direction of the axis of the selection path. I can't say
I've ever run into this before, but I'm not sure if this is obvious or desirable
behaviour.

-- 
Warren Hedley


 XSL-List info and archive:  http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list