[XSL-LIST Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

RE: strict error handling (was include vs. xsl:import)

Subject: RE: strict error handling (was include vs. xsl:import)
From: "Pawson, David" <DPawson@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 2 Aug 2000 10:21:20 +0100
RE: strict error handling (was  include vs. xsl:import)
 Kay Michael
> 
 I think Xalan's
> approach of producing warnings is better in many cases. 

As I've said before, I'd like to see that approach in all the processors.
Since its a screen warning, it can be ignored, its not fatal, but it
does alert the author as to a potential source of problems.
An excellent compromise IMHO.

Regards DaveP


 XSL-List info and archive:  http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list


Current Thread

PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!

Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced!

Buy Stylus Studio Now

Download The World's Best XML IDE!

Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today!

Don't miss another message! Subscribe to this list today.
Email
First Name
Last Name
Company
Subscribe in XML format
RSS 2.0
Atom 0.3
Site Map | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Trademarks
Free Stylus Studio XML Training:
W3C Member
Stylus Studio® and DataDirect XQuery ™are products from DataDirect Technologies, is a registered trademark of Progress Software Corporation, in the U.S. and other countries. © 2004-2011 All Rights Reserved.