Jobin, Eric writes:
 > I've been having an arguments with a co-workers about Saxon versus XT.   He
 > believes that XT should be "THE" tool while I argue that Saxon has all the
 > power and flexibility.  What do you think?

There is no contest, unless/until XT either gets completed by James,
or someone else takes the code and releases a complete (eg)
openXT. How can you live with a processor which does not implement the
whole spec?

Sebastian


 XSL-List info and archive:  http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list