Many developers, due to the nature of their development tools (ASPs, VB,
Delphi) have no easy way to use most of the other XSLT implementations.

MSXML3 is a powerful library that can be used trough COM interfaces. It
is a strong and no cost alternative to use XSLT from development tools
that have a good support for COM.


If the picture that is displayed to this potential users of XSLT is that
MSXML is a very bad thing, maybe they just quit using XSLT altogether.


We are not defending Microsoft and not even defending the whole MSXML
parser implementation. What we defend is a FAIR EVALUATION of the 
quality of its XSLT implementation... and only in MSXML3. (I think that
everyone agrees that IE5's version implementation is a nasty one.)


Aren't these postings XSLT related enough?


Have fun,

Paulo Gaspar


> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> [mailto:owner-xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]On Behalf Of alex chang
> Sent: Friday, July 07, 2000 15:44
> To: xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: Re: ... (Can we get some POSITIVE suggestions please?)
> 
> 
> "There is no restriction on what may be posted to the XSL-List provided
> it is related to XSL." in a post just a few days ago by the xsl 
> list owner. 
> But it's obvious a couple of you take the pro- and anti- msxml way too 
> personally. If you don't like the posts that relate to msxml then simply 
> don't reply. Let's not work up a heart attack over this.
> 
> -alex
> ________________________________________________________________________
> Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com
> 
> 
>  XSL-List info and archive:  http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
> 


 XSL-List info and archive:  http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list