Re: Only child pattern -- XT bug or my failure?

Okay, I tried Saxon -- I got instant-saxon -- and indeed it did work as I
expected.  

So, other than the fact than the fact XT suffers from a bug here, what is
the difference?  We've been long-time happy users of James Clark's many
fine SGML tools, so I had a natural inclination to use XT.  We've been
using XT for simpler conversions for six months but now I am on an
ambitious revamp of some of our processes and had hoped to rely on XSLT.

On Wed, 7 Jun 2000, Warren Hedley wrote:

> > Looking at the XSLT recommendation, I see
> > that the correct match should be DOC/DIV[last()=1].  However, when
> > documents have multiple divisions (that is, they are correctly marked up
> > with no superfluous wrapping DIV), the first DIV gets matched and the
> > template gets applied; siblings get left alone.
> 
> This isn't probably much help - based on the attached results, I can
> only really suggest you try Saxon.



 XSL-List info and archive:  http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list