[XSL-LIST Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Re: Only child pattern -- XT bug or my failure?

Subject: Re: Only child pattern -- XT bug or my failure?
From: Chris Powell <sooty@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 7 Jun 2000 17:39:02 -0400 (EDT)
chris powell
Okay, I tried Saxon -- I got instant-saxon -- and indeed it did work as I
expected.  

So, other than the fact than the fact XT suffers from a bug here, what is
the difference?  We've been long-time happy users of James Clark's many
fine SGML tools, so I had a natural inclination to use XT.  We've been
using XT for simpler conversions for six months but now I am on an
ambitious revamp of some of our processes and had hoped to rely on XSLT.

On Wed, 7 Jun 2000, Warren Hedley wrote:

> > Looking at the XSLT recommendation, I see
> > that the correct match should be DOC/DIV[last()=1].  However, when
> > documents have multiple divisions (that is, they are correctly marked up
> > with no superfluous wrapping DIV), the first DIV gets matched and the
> > template gets applied; siblings get left alone.
> 
> This isn't probably much help - based on the attached results, I can
> only really suggest you try Saxon.



 XSL-List info and archive:  http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list


Current Thread

PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!

Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced!

Buy Stylus Studio Now

Download The World's Best XML IDE!

Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today!

Don't miss another message! Subscribe to this list today.
Email
First Name
Last Name
Company
Subscribe in XML format
RSS 2.0
Atom 0.3
Site Map | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Trademarks
Free Stylus Studio XML Training:
W3C Member
Stylus Studio® and DataDirect XQuery ™are products from DataDirect Technologies, is a registered trademark of Progress Software Corporation, in the U.S. and other countries. © 2004-2013 All Rights Reserved.