[XSL-LIST Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Re: Machine-readable comments (Was: How is this part of the

Subject: Re: Machine-readable comments (Was: How is this part of the XSLT specificationto be interpreted?)
From: Mike Brown <mike@xxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 21 Jun 2000 18:12:57 -0600 (MDT)
Re: Machine-readable comments (Was: How is this part of the
> Mike Brown says:
> >Comments are not required to be reported by an XML parser, so you should
> >never depend on being able to process them with XSLT.
> 
> Isn't that a little harsh? If I know what parser I'll be using, and I
> know that the stylesheets won't be going to a place where an unknown
> parser is used, why not have specially-structured comments? 

You are correct.
Under those circumstances, it is not unreasonable.

   - Mike
____________________________________________________________________
Mike J. Brown, software engineer at         My XML/XSL resources:
webb.net in Denver, Colorado, USA           http://www.skew.org/xml/


 XSL-List info and archive:  http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list


Current Thread

PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!

Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced!

Buy Stylus Studio Now

Download The World's Best XML IDE!

Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today!

Don't miss another message! Subscribe to this list today.
Email
First Name
Last Name
Company
Subscribe in XML format
RSS 2.0
Atom 0.3
Site Map | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Trademarks
Free Stylus Studio XML Training:
W3C Member
Stylus Studio® and DataDirect XQuery ™are products from DataDirect Technologies, is a registered trademark of Progress Software Corporation, in the U.S. and other countries. © 2004-2013 All Rights Reserved.