RE: feature request

> > So this is the way of the future for XSLT?
> > 
> > If you can't support something in a way that
> > works (entities), attempt to
> > convince people that they shouldn't even want
> > them in the first place ... ?
>
>I don't think its fair to blame XSL for all this. It is going with the 
>flow of things like SAX and DOM, which do not provide access to
>entities. For XSLT to do otherwise would be to place a much bigger
>burden on the implementors.


Summary then?

I continue to use the kludge to get what I need?

No response from the editors?

Regards, DaveP


 XSL-List info and archive:  http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list