Re: Sibling text() Content Match [was: Re: expression value
> If I'm right, using text() would have alleviated some of the > redundancy/lack of specificity that David pointed out in my solution, yes? nope, if you change . to text() in your solution it won't work at all as then you'll only be testing for character data of the record element not any of its children or grandchildren but looking at your example record doesn't have any character data (except white space nodes between data-field elements) Using = with contains isn't really redundant it's just weird. David XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!
Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced!
Download The World's Best XML IDE!
Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today!
Subscribe in XML format