Re: referring to images in XSL FO

David Tolpin writes:
 > >  > If the url argument is not taken within url(...) it is not possible to parse
 > >  > shorthands.
 > >  > 
 > > 
 > > speaking for PassiveTeX, I have no intention, ever, ever, of supporting
 > > shorthands......
 > 
 > Do you have no intention to support them because it is the wrong
 > way? Or they are difficult to implement? Or one can go pretty happy
 > without them?

all of the above. I think they are evil, hard to
implement for me, and unnecessary. the bottom line is, who writes .fo
files? human fingers or computers? do computers need shorthands?

sebastian


 XSL-List info and archive:  http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list