|
[XSL-LIST Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] RE: Implementing " and ' in literals
You're saying that a construct like "@comment()" is "total nonsense". I
don't think it's any more "total nonsense" than (say) "number('London')" or
"/.." is. It's well-defined: it means "find all comment nodes on the
attribute axis", and the result is always an empty node-set. And Saxon, at
least, implements it correctly and conformantly.
Mike Kay
> From: Matt Sergeant [mailto:matt@xxxxxxxxxxxx]
> > > There aren't _any_ conforming implementations of XPath -
> > > anyone who reads the grammar carefully will know what I
> mean by that.
> >
> > Explain please?
>
> It's the definition of Step (I'm only including the relevant
> parts of the grammar):
> Which allows for:
>
> '@' NodeType '(' ')'
XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|

Cart








