[XSL-LIST Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

RE: XSLT vs Omnimark

Subject: RE: XSLT vs Omnimark
From: Kay Michael <Michael.Kay@xxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 7 Mar 2000 10:23:45 -0000
omnimark 7 download
> Yes, but how do you get around the fundamental
> requirement for a lot of RAM?
> 
> I don't see how we can ever expect to parse a 150meg
> document using XSLT ...

I think it's feasible in principle if the document has a DTD: it should be
possible to create sub-trees of the source document "just-in-time" and to
discard them from memory when they are no longer needed.

Alternatively, it should be possible to create the trees as persistent
objects in an ODB and translate the XPath expressions into OQL queries. All
good stuff for a research project.

But neither of these approaches will ever be as fast as a serial
transformation. To achieve that, I think a different language is needed.

Mike Kay


 XSL-List info and archive:  http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list


Current Thread

PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!

Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced!

Buy Stylus Studio Now

Download The World's Best XML IDE!

Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today!

Don't miss another message! Subscribe to this list today.
Email
First Name
Last Name
Company
Subscribe in XML format
RSS 2.0
Atom 0.3
Site Map | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Trademarks
Free Stylus Studio XML Training:
W3C Member
Stylus Studio® and DataDirect XQuery ™are products from DataDirect Technologies, is a registered trademark of Progress Software Corporation, in the U.S. and other countries. © 2004-2013 All Rights Reserved.