RE: ECMA script - no thanks

Hi,

Dave said:
Coming from the digest I can't reference the
thread, but I would like to register concern
re ECMAscript being a needed fuctionality in
any further rec from w3c.

I think the conclusion that this list supports
any scripting language as part of a future rec
is unsupported by the mail, being a response
to Didiers suggestion, from one person,
which in itself was ambivalent.

Didier replies:
So, if the group do not want ECMA script what the group wants then? I saw a
thread talking about using Java as a way to extend XSLT. Is this what is
wanted? Does this mean that any extension running in a browser would be in
the form of an applet?

Cheers
Didier PH Martin
----------------------------------------------
Email: martind@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Conferences: Web Chicago(http://www.mfweb.com)
             XML Europe (http://www.gca.org)
Book: XML Professional (http://www.wrox.com)
column: Style Matters (http://www.xml.com)
Products: http://www.netfolder.com


 XSL-List info and archive:  http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list