[XSL-LIST Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Re: preceding-sibling with sorted for-each

Subject: Re: preceding-sibling with sorted for-each
From: Steve Tinney <stinney@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 15 Mar 2000 12:37:11 -0500
xsl function preceding sibling
> > Saxon saxon:node-set() [documented] and also saxon:nodeset()
> > [undocumented]
> 
> Actually it's documented that in matching XSL function names to Java
> method names all hyphens  are ignored

I suspected something of the sort.  It is not guaranteed, though, that
an extension function name map directly (after mangling) to a Java
method name, is it?

 Steve


 XSL-List info and archive:  http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list


Current Thread

PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!

Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced!

Buy Stylus Studio Now

Download The World's Best XML IDE!

Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today!

Don't miss another message! Subscribe to this list today.
Email
First Name
Last Name
Company
Subscribe in XML format
RSS 2.0
Atom 0.3
Site Map | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Trademarks
Free Stylus Studio XML Training:
W3C Member
Stylus Studio® and DataDirect XQuery ™are products from DataDirect Technologies, is a registered trademark of Progress Software Corporation, in the U.S. and other countries. © 2004-2013 All Rights Reserved.