[XSL-LIST Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

RE: JavaScript

Subject: RE: JavaScript
From: Kay Michael <Michael.Kay@xxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 15 Feb 2000 18:23:09 -0000
RE: JavaScript
> However much I grumble that a comment is a comment and may be ignored.

But as a pure mathematician, you ought to be looking at how the word is
defined, and not at what it means in other contexts. The only thing XML says
about comments is that the parser may or may not allow the application to
see them.

I've just had an exchange with Norman Walsh complaining that the AElfred
parser (which I use by default) validates parameter entity references
occurring within comments in the DTD. But as far as I can see, if you ignore
preconceptions about the purpose of comments and just read the spec, that is
exactly what an XML parser should do.

But of course we're in this mess because all these specs actually rely very
heavily on unstated assumptions about the meaning of words.

Mike Kay 


 XSL-List info and archive:  http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list


Current Thread

PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!

Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced!

Buy Stylus Studio Now

Download The World's Best XML IDE!

Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today!

Don't miss another message! Subscribe to this list today.
Email
First Name
Last Name
Company
Subscribe in XML format
RSS 2.0
Atom 0.3
Site Map | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Trademarks
Free Stylus Studio XML Training:
W3C Member
Stylus Studio® and DataDirect XQuery ™are products from DataDirect Technologies, is a registered trademark of Progress Software Corporation, in the U.S. and other countries. © 2004-2013 All Rights Reserved.