Re: XSL iteration

Although, one argument might be that while "others" have been waiting for
things to happen we at least have an implementation we can work with.

I know in my work place we would rather have this than wait for the
"next(??)" version of Netscape.

I support Microsoft in what they have done as it has allowed me to at least
introduce the technology to companies I have worked with wihtout having to
worry about hte browser being changed day to day - with greatest respect, I
see this happening on this list every week ! (which isn't always a bad thing
!).

cheers,
Steven

Steven Livingstone
Glasgow, Scotland.
+44 (0) 7771 957 280

Professional XML
http://www.wrox.com/Consumer/Store/Details.asp?ISBN=1861003110
Professional Site Server 3
http://www.wrox.com/Consumer/Store/Details.asp?ISBN=1861002696
Professional Site Server 3.0 Commerce Edition
http://www.wrox.com/Consumer/Store/Details.asp?ISBN=1861002505
----- Original Message -----
From: David Carlisle <davidc@xxxxxxxxx>
To: <xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Thursday, December 02, 1999 9:54 PM
Subject: Re: XSL iteration


>
> > I would prefer a generic solution, but it should run on IE5
> apart from the letters x s and l there is by now essentially nothing
> in common between xslt and the language-known-as-xsl-in-ie5
> so the idea of a generic xsl solution that runs on ie5 is rather
> optimistic I fear.
>
> David
>
>
>  XSL-List info and archive:  http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
>


 XSL-List info and archive:  http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list