Re: EZ/X Speed: Rebunking Oracle's Debunk: WAS (Getting Some

EZ/XML conformance, as measured by the oasis-open test suite, should be
pretty reasonable. I think we are presently passing 967 of the 1065 tests.
According to David Brownell's recent article at XML.com this would place
EZ/X behind only his parser and XP for conformance.

Of course, we target perfection and expect to eliminate any remaining areas
of non-conformance as we continue development.

Rick Ross

James Tauber wrote:
> 
> > WHO'S FASTEST?
> > First, however, before any major flame erupts about Java XSL speed,
> 
> Cool, a flame war I'm not involved in. *whoops* too late.
> 
> > Activated Intelligence wants to acknowledge that the current speed leader
> is
> > James Clark's XT - a fine package and worthy of respect for many reasons.
> We
> > do not claim EZ/XSL to be faster than XT yet <grin>, though our EZ/XML
> > parser speeds past his XP parser package...
> 
> What is your parser's conformance like? While I am not doubting your ability
> to write a faster parser than XP... all other things being equal, parsers
> faster than XP generally get their speed by dropping some requirements in
> the spec.
> 
> James Tauber
> 
>  XSL-List info and archive:  http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list

begin:vcard 
n:Ross;Rick
tel;fax:(734) 661-4216
tel;work:(919) 678-0300
x-mozilla-html:FALSE
org:<hr><a href=http://www.javalobby.org>Unite for Java!<br><img border=0 src=http://www.javalobby.org/images/jl_small.gif>
adr:;;1001 Winstead Drive;Cary;NC;27513;US
version:2.1
email;internet:rick@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
title:President - Activated Intelligence, LLC
x-mozilla-cpt:;-29408
fn:Rick Ross
end:vcard