Re: XSLT Question: Inserting a DOCTYPE decl

> It would have been easier, and more extensible to multiple output
> files, if they had made <xsl:output> an instruction, as I did with
> <saxon:output>. 

Yes, although when I last thought about that, I couldn't see a way of
adopting saxon:output into the xsl namespace that would fit well with
the existing output functionality, so I guess xsl:output will have to
stay as is and xsl2 have xsl:document (which is something along the
lines of xt:document or saxon:output). Shame really as with the extended
output method possibilities in saxon:output `output' is a better name
than `document'.

David


 XSL-List info and archive:  http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list