[XSL-LIST Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Re: Optimisation (was Remove duplicates from a list)

Subject: Re: Optimisation (was Remove duplicates from a list)
From: Tim Taylor <ttaylor@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 29 Oct 1999 14:24:50 -0400
sql remove duplicates
Kay Michael wrote:
> 
> > This is entirely conjecture, but I predict that optimization
> > will follow a similar path as programming language compilers.
> 
> Yes, though I suspect SQL is a better analogy, because we're dealing with a
> more declarative language. And it took about 10 years for the theory of SQL
> optimisation to become refined.

Yes, that is a better analogy.  It makes me wonder, even today, if you
have a complex SQL query, you're often better off giving optimization
hints instead of letting the query optimizer have at it.  That's the
case we've found with MS SQL Server, anyhow, which maybe is damning in
and of itself :)

How much has optimization played into the design of XSL and XPath?  Have
the XSL processor implementors been able to suggest modifications to the
spec to improve the optimizability?  Apologies if the answers should be
obvious to me.

Tim


 XSL-List info and archive:  http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list


Current Thread

PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!

Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced!

Buy Stylus Studio Now

Download The World's Best XML IDE!

Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today!

Don't miss another message! Subscribe to this list today.
Email
First Name
Last Name
Company
Subscribe in XML format
RSS 2.0
Atom 0.3
Site Map | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Trademarks
Free Stylus Studio XML Training:
W3C Member
Stylus Studio® and DataDirect XQuery ™are products from DataDirect Technologies, is a registered trademark of Progress Software Corporation, in the U.S. and other countries. © 2004-2013 All Rights Reserved.